me, my dad, and politics

Just as I was desperately wondering what to post on my blog today, my column was published in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Read it here or read it here:

In my life, polarization sits squarely in the political space between me and my father. I grew up like many suburban kids, far more interested in shopping and gossip than world news and national affairs. No one discussed politics or religion at the dinner table in our house.

 

 

In the past 10 years though, my father, who has always been politically conservative, has not only become more so but also more outspoken.

At the same time, I spent four great years at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a fifth studying abroad. The people I met in Madison, the intellectual environment and my time abroad rapidly turned me into a sponge for new ideas, values and the nuances of culture. I gradually became more liberal on most issues.

Slowly, conversations with my dad heated up. We rarely argue, but he often e-mails me conservative columns raking Democrats and the mainstream media across the coals. When I get inspired, I reply with my own thoughts or the counterarguments of national columnists I respect and agree with.

The debate has landed on my blog, where long threads of comments have resulted from my posts on immigration or the president.

In one way, our views illustrate the kind of polarization that has become a national obsession. Commentators talk about it. Books have been published on it. Politicians blame it for the inability to pass important legislation. In August, the Journal Sentinel published the responses of a non-scientific survey based on the question: “How polarized are we?”

But unlike highly confrontational campaign ads, inflammatory speeches by intensely partisan politicians or the shallow take on issues expressed on television news programs, discussions between me and my dad help us understand each other’s point of view.

Considering how strongly we disagree on many issues, you would think we would not be able to converse at all. But that doesn’t have to be the case. Avoiding rhetoric and genuinely listening to all sides certainly helps.

If only more of our elected officials could have half as many productive, reasonable conversations as the average American father and daughter have, we might make some progress.

Instead, special interest-bound congressional members and extremist media pundits have become the voice of national politics. We have been told we are so divided and so polarized that we can hardly speak to each other. But it’s not true.

I recently started working for a locally owned medical supply company in the area. My direct supervisor is a National Rifle Association member whose passion is teaching gun safety.

I personally wish firearms had never been invented, and I confess when I saw “NRA” embroidered on his shirt during my interview, I was concerned about how much I might end up censoring my own views at work.

But I have realized that in the business world, we learn to respect each other’s opinions. I get along great with my boss, and we have plenty of interesting discussions in our department. Most of our work force is plenty productive without total personal and political agreement.

If only our national debate could more resemble the everyday conversations of average co-workers, families and friends, we might make more compromises that benefit our community, city, state and nation.

We need to question the motives of our candidates and elected officials. We should demand they stop contributing to the relentless stream of rhetoric in our media-saturated world and start participating in the daily dialogue happening between average American citizens.

 

Advertisements

6 Responses to me, my dad, and politics

  1. laurafern says:

    A nice comment from conservative Steve:

    Good Morning Laura,

    Just a quick word from a conservative in Waukesha County – great column. I agree with you that we all need to listen to each other and not just repeat the slogans of our party affiliation or special interest groups. I’m sure I would agree with your father more times than with you on many points, I still think everyone should have their opinion and be able to voice it without being ridiculed for it. Congrats on the column and let your father know he did a good job.

    Thanks,
    Steve

  2. laurafern says:

    I also received an unbelievable comment from an older fellow who took my very insignificant side note about generally wishing firearms had not been invented and turned it into fodder for a response about all types of bodily harm and the safety he feels having a gun to protest himself.

    For those of you who care, the basis of me saying I wish firearms had not been invented stems from a feeling that had the human race never invented bombs, rifles, guns, etc, there would be a lot less senseless killing in the world.

    I fully understand that there are a lot of people out there who have firearms for the purpose of hunting (no problems with that, or target practice for sport, etc), but could we roll back in time and avoid a time where we didn’t have to worry about kids getting ahold of guns, accidental shootings, wars, etc, I think that would be worth it. I think the gain in that situation compared to the loss of gun sport and hunting would be worth it, to me. I understand many people do not feel this way, but that really was not the point of my column, so it seemed funny to comment on.

  3. Amanda says:

    I too have a very conservative father, went away to UW-Madison, travelled abroad, and drifted to the left. I also disagree on many political and cultural issues with my dad, but we still have a great, loving relationship. I also share your hope that perhaps those that make politics their profession could shake off their party affiliations and rhetoric so that some real progress can be made. Maybe I’m still a little naive, but I think most politicians want the best for their constituents. Perhaps if candidates from different schools of thought could recognize that, we could leave these meaningless personal attack ads behind, and focus on what really counts.

  4. laurafern says:

    Thanks for the comments Amanda!

  5. Matt says:

    Appreciated what you had to say, Laura. I wonder if there’s any applicability of what you talk about to religion, too. I’ve been discovering that as I leave the Christian mainstream, it becomes harder to have respectful discussions with certain individuals, to the point that I’m very careful about who I share my religious views with. Just a thought.

  6. laurafern says:

    I agree Matt, it’s very difficult. I cared a lot about what other people thought when I first left the Christian mainstream as we can call it, and as time passed I cared a lot less. I don’t get in a lot of theological or doctrinal conversations though anymore, but I don’t really fear those conversations or confrontations like I once did. It is defintely comparable and related to the political dialogue as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: